What Does cs executive company law case studies pdf Mean?
What Does cs executive company law case studies pdf Mean?
Blog Article
Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights although respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. On the aforesaid proposition, we are guided through the decision on the Supreme Court during the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court 92. 9. The aforesaid exceptions are missing inside the present case. In these types of circumstances, this petition is found to become not maintainable and is particularly dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more
Some sites may well specialize in specific areas of regulation, whilst others offer a broader database. Factors to take into consideration when choosing a website include things like the comprehensiveness in the database, the convenience of navigation, as well as the availability of advanced search options.
four. It has been noticed by this Court that there is a delay of someday inside the registration of FIR which hasn't been explained with the complainant. Moreover, there isn't any eye-witness in the alleged occurrence and the prosecution is counting on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession with the petitioners has actually been tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of them namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram took place to be the real brothers with the deceased but they did not respond at all towards the confessional statements from the petitioners and calmly observed them leaving, a single after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not glimpse much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on 14.02.2018 and there is no explanation concerning why her arrest wasn't effected after making of the alleged extra judicial confession. It has been held on countless occasions that extra judicial confession of an accused is a weak kind of evidence which could be manoeuvred because of the prosecution in almost any case where direct connecting evidence does not appear their way. The prosecution is usually depending on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word concerning presence of some light in the place, where they allegedly noticed the petitioners jointly over a motorcycle at four.
Information on accessing opinions and case-related documents for that Supreme Court with the United States is out there to the court’s website.
Subscription access exclusively for organizations/businesses (SCC ID expected) to criminal case information in participating Circuit Courts with the purpose of confirming of an individual’s date of birth.
This Court might interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer within a fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation click here of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding arrived at by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the conclusion or finding is such as no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may perhaps interfere with the summary or perhaps the finding and mold the relief to make it proper for the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is definitely the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-respect the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified via the decision of your Supreme Court while in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
96 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's well-settled that while contemplating the case of standard promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has to think about the advantage of all the qualified candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion to this sort of suitable candidates who are found to get most meritorious among them. Because the petitioner was held to generally be senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was ignored with the respondent department just to increase favor into the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy about the part in the respondent department.
whether while granting promotion senior employees were deemed for promotion or otherwise and submit the compliance report.(Promotion)
In federal or multi-jurisdictional regulation systems there may well exist conflicts between the assorted lower appellate courts. Sometimes these differences will not be resolved, and it may be necessary to distinguish how the legislation is applied in a single district, province, division or appellate department.
acquitted the appellants from all the charges therefore the same is dismissed being infructuous. (Criminal Revision )
When the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had a possibility to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may possibly allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is frequently only completed if the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Within the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence along with the petitioner company responded for the allegations therefore they were effectively aware about the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to generally be appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
this Court is still left with no option but to direct the respondents to notify the promotion with the petitioner in next rank .(Promotion)
A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition into the Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Advancement Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of an electricity grid station in their neighborhood, on designated “green belt” property. The Court listened to the matter to be a human rights case, as Article 184 (three) of the Pakistan Constitution supplies original jurisdiction for the Supreme Court to consider up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.
The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary to your determination of your current case are called obiter dicta, which constitute persuasive authority but are usually not technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil legislation jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[four]